Total Commodity Programs in South Carolina, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,223
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in South Carolina totaled $7,085,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ag South Farm Credit Aca ** | Douglas, GA 31534 | $309,068 |
2 | Seaside Farm Inc | St. Helena Island, SC 29920 | $240,800 |
3 | Haigler Farms Partnership | Cameron, SC 29030 | $158,285 |
4 | Titan Fruit & Vegetable Co Inc | Ridge Spring, SC 29129 | $123,248 |
5 | Nimmer Turf And Tree Farm Inc | Ridgeland, SC 29936 | $100,000 |
6 | Palmetto Farms | Fort Motte, SC 29135 | $85,272 |
7 | Crider Farms | Bamberg, SC 29003 | $76,214 |
8 | Mclaurin Farms | Elloree, SC 29047 | $70,251 |
9 | Lyons Brothers Farms | Elloree, SC 29047 | $66,238 |
10 | Riley Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $62,717 |
11 | Perrow Farms | Cameron, SC 29030 | $60,080 |
12 | Crapse Farms | Estill, SC 29918 | $55,991 |
13 | Gregg Covington Farms Partnership | Norway, SC 29113 | $53,668 |
14 | Rogers Brothers Farm | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $53,403 |
15 | Jameson Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $52,499 |
16 | Rouse Farms | Luray, SC 29932 | $52,256 |
17 | Mr Johnny Boyd Mcmillan | Lodge, SC 29082 | $47,518 |
18 | Enterprise Bank Of Sc ** | Ehrhardt, SC 29081 | $45,852 |
19 | Calhoun Farms | Clio, SC 29525 | $44,418 |
20 | Triple G Farms LLC | Cope, SC 29038 | $43,262 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>