Farm Subsidy information
Aiken County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Aiken County, South Carolina, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 69
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Aiken County, South Carolina totaled $2,408,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | James M Golden Jr | Wagener, SC 29164 | $71,123 |
2 | James Michael Dubose LLC | Monetta, SC 29105 | $19,649 |
3 | Shull Farms LLC | Salley, SC 29137 | $18,043 |
4 | Cowden Plantation Farms LLC | Jackson, SC 29831 | $12,784 |
5 | William George Sarvis III | Edgefield, SC 29824 | $9,838 |
6 | Ronnie G Cook | Wagener, SC 29164 | $9,041 |
7 | Herbert P Witter II | Aiken, SC 29802 | $4,547 |
8 | Tony Scott Howard | Wagener, SC 29164 | $4,335 |
9 | Brown & Mclean Farms LLC | Aiken, SC 29805 | $4,179 |
10 | , | $3,810 | |
11 | Michael Chapman | Jackson, SC 29831 | $3,432 |
12 | Mitchell R Morris | Aiken, SC 29805 | $2,944 |
13 | Brown Farms Inc | Aiken, SC 29805 | $2,434 |
14 | Kirkland J Williams | Springfield, SC 29146 | $2,255 |
15 | Catherine Miller Stewart | Charlotte, NC 28208 | $2,083 |
16 | John C Simmons | Williston, SC 29853 | $1,960 |
17 | Joey Greene | Jackson, SC 29831 | $1,764 |
18 | Lee Ann Givens | Williston, SC 29853 | $1,752 |
19 | Ralph E Roe Jr | Windsor, SC 29856 | $1,618 |
20 | Maxie Watkins | Leesville, SC 29070 | $1,594 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>