Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Anderson County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 261
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Anderson County, South Carolina totaled $1,371,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Charles E Martin | Anderson, SC 29621 | $3,305 |
82 | Danny Lee Ford II | Central, SC 29630 | $3,300 |
83 | Kenny Fladger | Easley, SC 29642 | $3,270 |
84 | Sammy Callaham | Belton, SC 29627 | $3,245 |
85 | Robert C Cathey | Anderson, SC 29621 | $3,135 |
86 | Barnes Family Farm | Pendleton, SC 29670 | $3,036 |
87 | Wayne Martin | Belton, SC 29627 | $3,025 |
88 | H Ivey Lowe | Belton, SC 29627 | $3,025 |
89 | Frederick N Garren Jr | Iva, SC 29655 | $3,025 |
90 | Thomas J Jones Jr | Iva, SC 29655 | $2,946 |
91 | John Chamblee | Anderson, SC 29626 | $2,915 |
92 | Allison M Dobbins | Anderson, SC 29625 | $2,860 |
93 | Randall M Griffis | Central, SC 29630 | $2,860 |
94 | Jason Thomas Wigington | Easley, SC 29641 | $2,860 |
95 | Clyde Hill Jr | Honea Path, SC 29654 | $2,750 |
96 | Mcadams Farm And Sausage LLC | Townville, SC 29689 | $2,750 |
97 | Tami Barnes | Starr, SC 29684 | $2,720 |
98 | John Wendell Ashley | Belton, SC 29627 | $2,695 |
99 | George Wheeler Shirley | Townville, SC 29689 | $2,662 |
100 | Duane E Brown | Iva, SC 29655 | $2,640 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”