Production Flexibility Program in Anderson County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 439
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Anderson County, South Carolina totaled $1,940,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Stanley Rhett Dobbins | Townville, SC 29689 | $129,069 |
2 | Major Farms, LLC | Honea Path, SC 29654 | $95,566 |
3 | William Franklin Gunnells | Honea Path, SC 29654 | $82,573 |
4 | Buddy Wood | Anderson, SC 29621 | $70,982 |
5 | W And J Brock Farms | Anderson, SC 29621 | $68,276 |
6 | Tom Garrison | Pendleton, SC 29670 | $63,297 |
7 | Mccown Enterprises Inc | Anderson, SC 29626 | $56,984 |
8 | Rufus A Martin Jr | Anderson, SC 29621 | $50,705 |
9 | James A Drake Jr | Starr, SC 29684 | $45,654 |
10 | Dobbins Cattle Co | Townville, SC 29689 | $39,326 |
11 | C D Chamblee | Anderson, SC 29626 | $38,905 |
12 | David Whitfield Estate | Belton, SC 29627 | $37,008 |
13 | Jerry Buffington | Belton, SC 29627 | $36,529 |
14 | William A Mcclain II | Anderson, SC 29625 | $35,634 |
15 | Jack C Dobbins | Townville, SC 29689 | $31,435 |
16 | Lawrence Campbell | Anderson, SC 29624 | $25,222 |
17 | Glenn E Mcgee | Anderson, SC 29621 | $24,850 |
18 | Thomas P Mcgee | Mountain City, TN 37683 | $24,572 |
19 | John D Durham Sr | Piedmont, SC 29673 | $23,018 |
20 | Darlene S Roach | Starr, SC 29684 | $21,070 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>