Total Commodity Programs in Bamberg County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 864
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Bamberg County, South Carolina totaled $43,832,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Clyde E Causey | Denmark, SC 29042 | $92,381 |
82 | Glenn Cappelmann Dba All Turf | Ehrhardt, SC 29081 | $89,968 |
83 | Williams Farms LLC | Punta Gorda, FL 33982 | $89,007 |
84 | Harvey L Mcmillan | Branchville, SC 29432 | $88,839 |
85 | Dennis Randall Ulmer | Lodge, SC 29082 | $88,082 |
86 | Merle Ray Diem Sr | Bamberg, SC 29003 | $86,985 |
87 | Larry Russell | Bamberg, SC 29003 | $86,738 |
88 | J Wesley Crider III | Bamberg, SC 29003 | $85,455 |
89 | Dean A Ayer | Ehrhardt, SC 29081 | $84,891 |
90 | Phillip Larry Sandifer | Blackville, SC 29817 | $83,131 |
91 | James E Layden | Bamberg, SC 29003 | $81,405 |
92 | D H & Gene Rowell Inc | Hilda, SC 29813 | $80,769 |
93 | Henry F Bamberg III | Bamberg, SC 29003 | $80,487 |
94 | Jeffrey Scott Sandifer | Blackville, SC 29817 | $78,177 |
95 | Christopher Philip Sandifer | Blackville, SC 29817 | $78,172 |
96 | J. Alvin Hiers | Ehrhardt, SC 29081 | $77,336 |
97 | Shiloh Farms LLC | Mount Pleasant, SC 29464 | $76,522 |
98 | James And Walker Collins | Olar, SC 29843 | $74,278 |
99 | Leroy L. Black | Irmo, SC 29063 | $74,110 |
100 | Charles W Crider | Bamberg, SC 29003 | $73,960 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”