Total Conservation Programs in Bamberg County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 86
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Bamberg County, South Carolina totaled $149,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Steven A Rodger | Key West, FL 33040 | $1,994 |
22 | John W. Williamson, III | Denmark, SC 29042 | $1,962 |
23 | Colby Ayer | Ehrhardt, SC 29081 | $1,929 |
24 | Andrew Thomas Braun Family Trust | The Villages, FL 32163 | $1,744 |
25 | Baxter Family Farm LLC | North Charleston, SC 29406 | $1,734 |
26 | Brenda B Corley | North Augusta, SC 29841 | $1,727 |
27 | Donald Brandt | Olar, SC 29843 | $1,699 |
28 | John C Russell Jr | Bamberg, SC 29003 | $1,682 |
29 | Harry M. Anderson | Barnwell, SC 29812 | $1,579 |
30 | Shiloh Farms LLC | Mount Pleasant, SC 29464 | $1,560 |
31 | Jonathan S Ray | Woodstock, GA 30188 | $1,556 |
32 | Esther Rose O Macilroy Trust | Seattle, WA 98118 | $1,535 |
33 | Dean A Ayer | Ehrhardt, SC 29081 | $1,471 |
34 | Joe M Templeton Jr | Blackville, SC 29817 | $1,437 |
35 | Varn Properties LLC | Ehrhardt, SC 29081 | $1,408 |
36 | Watson Carter Farm LLC | Ehrhardt, SC 29081 | $1,400 |
37 | Fletcher S. Brabham | Bamberg, SC 29003 | $1,316 |
38 | Chester M Kearse Jr | Orangeburg, SC 29118 | $1,294 |
39 | Fannie Lorine Tarrant | Bamberg, SC 29003 | $1,290 |
40 | Ted Brandt Family Limited Partnership | Ehrhardt, SC 29081 | $1,222 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”