Total Commodity Programs in Barnwell County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 950
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Barnwell County, South Carolina totaled $44,522,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rob Bates Farm LLC | Williston, SC 29853 | $1,495,557 |
2 | Bruce O'neal Bates | Williston, SC 29853 | $1,423,846 |
3 | Ted W Craig | Blackville, SC 29817 | $1,400,843 |
4 | Walker Nix Farms, LLC | Elko, SC 29826 | $1,372,556 |
5 | L Vernon Cheek Sr | Barnwell, SC 29812 | $1,302,731 |
6 | Clinton T Boyleston | Williston, SC 29853 | $1,235,209 |
7 | Clinton S Youngblood Iv | Elko, SC 29826 | $1,099,594 |
8 | Ag South Farm Credit Aca ** | Douglas, GA 31534 | $1,044,988 |
9 | Phillip Larry Sandifer | Blackville, SC 29817 | $986,075 |
10 | Jeanette Handberry Jamison | Blackville, SC 29817 | $964,111 |
11 | C S Youngblood III | Elko, SC 29826 | $938,619 |
12 | Phillip Sandifer And Sons Farms LLC | Blackville, SC 29817 | $734,109 |
13 | John Travis Still | Blackville, SC 29817 | $718,670 |
14 | Gene Walker Nix Jr | Elko, SC 29826 | $710,148 |
15 | Goodland LLC | Springfield, SC 29146 | $646,559 |
16 | Richardson Farms Inc | Barnwell, SC 29812 | $641,323 |
17 | Troy O Jamison | Blackville, SC 29817 | $641,154 |
18 | Joe J Bates | Blackville, SC 29817 | $631,998 |
19 | Browning Farms Inc | Barnwell, SC 29812 | $577,901 |
20 | Gene Nix | Elko, SC 29826 | $539,763 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>