Tobacco Loss Assistance Program in Berkeley County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 26
Recipients of Tobacco Loss Assistance Program from farms in Berkeley County, South Carolina totaled $114,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Tobacco Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lois Nell Entwistle | Bonneau, SC 29431 | $42,853 |
2 | Richard N Dennis II | Saint Stephen, SC 29479 | $13,462 |
3 | Thomas E Dennis | Bonneau, SC 29431 | $11,739 |
4 | Melvin Mcclennon | Saint Stephen, SC 29479 | $6,673 |
5 | Chris S Mcmakin Jr | Saint Stephen, SC 29479 | $5,784 |
6 | Thomas E Dennis Jr | Bonneau, SC 29431 | $3,893 |
7 | Harry A Dennis Sr | Bonneau, SC 29431 | $3,023 |
8 | Frampton Mcmakin | Saint Stephen, SC 29479 | $2,882 |
9 | Isco Mcmakin | Saint Stephen, SC 29479 | $2,860 |
10 | Thomas C Giggleman | Bonneau, SC 29431 | $2,509 |
11 | Aletha Mcmakin | Saint Stephen, SC 29479 | $2,272 |
12 | Nathaniel Wallace | Saint Stephen, SC 29479 | $1,982 |
13 | Clarence Wallace | Saint Stephen, SC 29479 | $1,982 |
14 | Estate Of Marion Fulmore C/o Sylv | Mt Pleasant, SC 29464 | $1,796 |
15 | Brenda Frierson | Saint Stephen, SC 29479 | $1,745 |
16 | Maxine M Ravenell | Saint Stephen, SC 29479 | $1,648 |
17 | Darria Mcclennon | Saint Stephen, SC 29479 | $1,315 |
18 | Hugh Giggleman | Saint Stephen, SC 29479 | $1,254 |
19 | Harry A Dennis Jr | Saint Stephen, SC 29479 | $1,217 |
20 | Hamp Middleton Jr | Saint Stephen, SC 29479 | $1,032 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>