Farm Subsidy information

Calhoun County, South Carolina

Total Subsidies in Calhoun County, South Carolina, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,119

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calhoun County, South Carolina totaled $161,675,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
21Jesse D Shirer IIILone Star, SC 29030$1,337,549
22Michael P ShirerCameron, SC 29030$1,299,197
23Mark OttSaint Matthews, SC 29135$1,259,676
24John Steven WilesElloree, SC 29047$1,236,796
25John W HaneFort Motte, SC 29135$1,233,126
26John H Inabinet FarmsOrangeburg, SC 29118$1,172,841
27Lang Syne FarmSaint Matthews, SC 29135$1,168,553
28James D Rast JrCameron, SC 29030$1,133,604
29Jeffrey Legree KaiglerSwansea, SC 29160$1,121,752
30Carson FarmsElloree, SC 29047$1,095,959
31Jeff ReevesElloree, SC 29047$1,082,302
32Longstreet Farms IncSaint Matthews, SC 29135$1,051,271
33William J Spiers JrCameron, SC 29030$1,031,521
34Reed & Sons Farms LLCSt Matthews, SC 29135$1,026,688
35J Cecil Moore JrNorth, SC 29112$1,003,641
36William M Shirer JrCameron, SC 29030$951,717
37William M Shirer IIICameron, SC 29030$944,735
38James M Sikes JrSaint Matthews, SC 29135$924,573
39Raymond StablerNorth, SC 29112$869,046
40Curtis Russell DukesSt Matthews, SC 29135$855,749

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag