Farm Subsidy information
Calhoun County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Calhoun County, South Carolina, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 134
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calhoun County, South Carolina totaled $4,810,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jeffrey Legree Kaigler | Swansea, SC 29160 | $17,220 |
22 | Kendall Wannamaker | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $14,314 |
23 | Mary Lil Wannamaker | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $14,314 |
24 | Bickley Farms Inc | Elloree, SC 29047 | $14,274 |
25 | Mark Ott | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $13,881 |
26 | Carson Farms | Elloree, SC 29047 | $12,840 |
27 | Kym Farm Inc | Elloree, SC 29047 | $12,640 |
28 | , | $10,972 | |
29 | W H Bull | Cameron, SC 29030 | $10,495 |
30 | William H Bull Jr | Cameron, SC 29030 | $10,495 |
31 | K & R Farm LLC | St Matthews, SC 29135 | $10,122 |
32 | Edward M Rast Jr | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $9,550 |
33 | Kathryn Nixon Rast | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $9,550 |
34 | John H Inabinet Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29118 | $9,014 |
35 | Strock Farms Partnership | Elloree, SC 29047 | $7,135 |
36 | Donnie B Porth Farm | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $6,976 |
37 | Kevin Ott | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $6,282 |
38 | Longstreet Farms Inc | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $5,855 |
39 | Travis Shirer | Lone Star, SC 29030 | $5,784 |
40 | John Steven Wiles | Elloree, SC 29047 | $5,776 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”