Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Calhoun County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 84
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Calhoun County, South Carolina totaled $885,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lee Blackman Jr | Elloree, SC 29047 | $5,708 |
42 | Longstreet Farms Inc | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $5,330 |
43 | Tristram J Waystack | Orangeburg, SC 29118 | $4,997 |
44 | John Olson III | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $3,856 |
45 | Elizabeth Prickett Olson | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $3,856 |
46 | W K Pooser Jr | Cameron, SC 29030 | $3,727 |
47 | Richard Carson | Cameron, SC 29030 | $3,549 |
48 | Lone Star Farms LLC | Cameron, SC 29030 | $2,687 |
49 | James E Rucker III | St Matthews, SC 29135 | $2,637 |
50 | Russell Ott | St Matthews, SC 29135 | $2,603 |
51 | Johnny B Mcmahan Jr | St Matthews, SC 29135 | $2,499 |
52 | Shawn T Pound | St Matthews, SC 29135 | $2,471 |
53 | Roger L Hill | Gaston, SC 29053 | $2,375 |
54 | Interlaken Plantation LLC | Cameron, SC 29030 | $2,260 |
55 | Travis Shirer | Lone Star, SC 29030 | $1,753 |
56 | Rhett H Taber | Fort Motte, SC 29135 | $1,640 |
57 | John W Hane | Fort Motte, SC 29135 | $1,640 |
58 | Cameron Farms LLC | Orangeburg, SC 29116 | $1,533 |
59 | Charles Horger Dba Oak Lane Farm | St Matthews, SC 29135 | $1,520 |
60 | Harvest Drive Farms | Cameron, SC 29030 | $1,510 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”