Farm Subsidy information
Calhoun County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Calhoun County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 220
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calhoun County, South Carolina totaled $6,992,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kathryn Nixon Rast | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $30,590 |
42 | Longstreet Farms Inc | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $25,936 |
43 | James Howard Shirer Jr | Orangeburg, SC 29118 | $25,729 |
44 | Prickett Farms, LLC | Columbia, SC 29206 | $23,900 |
45 | James M Sikes Jr | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $23,111 |
46 | Richard Carson | Cameron, SC 29030 | $21,230 |
47 | W K Pooser Jr | Cameron, SC 29030 | $19,764 |
48 | John Olson III | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $18,115 |
49 | Elizabeth Prickett Olson | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $18,115 |
50 | Rawl Dargan Culclasure III | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $16,165 |
51 | Nottoc Farm | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $14,348 |
52 | Belleville Farms LLC | St Matthews, SC 29135 | $13,885 |
53 | Lone Star Farms LLC | Cameron, SC 29030 | $12,545 |
54 | Riley Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $12,165 |
55 | Kyle Monroe Carson | Cameron, SC 29030 | $11,742 |
56 | James Travis Avent | Cameron, SC 29030 | $11,371 |
57 | Interlaken Plantation LLC | Cameron, SC 29030 | $11,299 |
58 | Lois H Johnson | Orangeburg, SC 29118 | $11,061 |
59 | Frederick W Robinson | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $9,944 |
60 | Low Falls Wholesale Nursery | Cameron, SC 29030 | $9,868 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”