Market Loss Assistance Program in Calhoun County, South Carolina, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 457

Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Calhoun County, South Carolina totaled $5,566,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Market Loss Assistance Program
1995-2023
41Jerry D CarsonElloree, SC 29047$42,046
42Glenn Russell ShannonSaint Matthews, SC 29135$41,086
43W K Pooser JrCameron, SC 29030$39,660
44Donnie B Porth FarmSaint Matthews, SC 29135$37,031
45James M Sikes JrSaint Matthews, SC 29135$34,991
46Curtis Russell DukesSt Matthews, SC 29135$33,219
47William M Shirer IIICameron, SC 29030$32,880
48George C Bull JrCameron, SC 29030$32,038
49Delbert C InabinetOrangeburg, SC 29118$30,367
50R D Wannamaker JrSaint Matthews, SC 29135$27,001
51George T PerrowCameron, SC 29030$25,901
52Joe L WannamakerSaint Matthews, SC 29135$24,847
53Julius P Thompson JrVance, SC 29163$24,834
54Wannamaker Sc Properties LLCTampa, FL 33609$23,818
55Hi Cotton FarmHilton Head Island, SC 29928$22,634
56Frank M Wannamaker JrHilton Head Island, SC 29928$21,737
57Edward M RastSaint Matthews, SC 29135$21,488
58Caroline F HairSaint Matthews, SC 29135$20,722
59Carl WeeksCameron, SC 29030$20,203
60W Keitt Wannamaker JrBaton Rouge, LA 70808$19,474

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag