Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Calhoun County, South Carolina, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 121
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Calhoun County, South Carolina totaled $1,110,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | W K Pooser Jr | Cameron, SC 29030 | $4,800 |
42 | James H Bookhart | Elloree, SC 29047 | $4,716 |
43 | , | $4,326 | |
44 | Riley Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $3,828 |
45 | Russell Ott | St Matthews, SC 29135 | $2,905 |
46 | James Howard Shirer Jr | Orangeburg, SC 29118 | $2,821 |
47 | James M Sikes Jr | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $2,819 |
48 | , | $2,733 | |
49 | Prickett Farms, LLC | Columbia, SC 29206 | $2,706 |
50 | Lois H Johnson | Orangeburg, SC 29118 | $2,397 |
51 | Kyle Monroe Carson | Cameron, SC 29030 | $2,259 |
52 | Flea Bite LLC | Cameron, SC 29030 | $2,203 |
53 | Shane Carlton Weeks | Elloree, SC 29047 | $1,900 |
54 | Harvest Drive Farms | Cameron, SC 29030 | $1,840 |
55 | Lone Star Farms LLC | Cameron, SC 29030 | $1,774 |
56 | Kevin Ott | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $1,744 |
57 | Stabler Family Limited Partnership | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $1,736 |
58 | John Olson III | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $1,538 |
59 | Elizabeth Prickett Olson | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $1,538 |
60 | Johnnie D Padgett | Cameron, SC 29030 | $1,484 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”