Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Calhoun County, South Carolina, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 113

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Calhoun County, South Carolina totaled $3,494,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
61John W HaneFort Motte, SC 29135$3,452
62James D Kohn Dba Sandy Run NurserSwansea, SC 29160$3,325
63Derek GallegosSaint Matthews, SC 29135$3,305
64Johnnie D PadgettCameron, SC 29030$3,304
65James Rucker JrSaint Matthews, SC 29135$3,054
66Kevin OttSaint Matthews, SC 29135$3,020
67Flea Bite LLCCameron, SC 29030$2,999
68Charles Horger Dba Oak Lane FarmSt Matthews, SC 29135$2,660
69Travis ShirerLone Star, SC 29030$2,516
70Johnny B Mcmahan JrSt Matthews, SC 29135$2,499
71Donald E CrimSaint Matthews, SC 29135$2,475
72Simpson SikesSaint Matthews, SC 29135$2,310
73Charles E Bozard JrSt Matthews, SC 29135$2,204
74Frederick W RobinsonSaint Matthews, SC 29135$2,028
75Bernie Lee WrightOrangeburg, SC 29116$2,000
76John Hayden Inabinet IvOrangeburg, SC 29118$1,998
77Jefferson L GatesCameron, SC 29030$1,994
78Dreher Ricky RuckerSaint Matthews, SC 29135$1,834
79Larry E ElmoreFort Motte, SC 29135$1,760
80Travis ShirerLone Star, SC 29030$1,753

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag