Counter Cyclical Program in Calhoun County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 412
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Calhoun County, South Carolina totaled $17,084,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Riley Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $54,846 |
62 | Kathryn W London | Columbia, SC 29201 | $47,733 |
63 | William H Bull Jr | Cameron, SC 29030 | $46,849 |
64 | Hayne Haigler | Cameron, SC 29030 | $44,046 |
65 | Glenn Russell Shannon | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $43,330 |
66 | Joe C & Wallace E Haigler | Cameron, SC 29030 | $42,522 |
67 | Stabler Family Limited Partnership | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $40,035 |
68 | James D Rast III | Cameron, SC 29030 | $38,884 |
69 | Calvin Strock | Elloree, SC 29047 | $38,750 |
70 | Jesse D Shirer Jr | Cameron, SC 29030 | $38,159 |
71 | George C Bull Jr | Cameron, SC 29030 | $37,483 |
72 | Joe L Wannamaker | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $35,445 |
73 | Deiderick Hane | Fort Motte, SC 29135 | $34,500 |
74 | Carson Brothers Farm | Elloree, SC 29047 | $32,468 |
75 | Jeff Reeves | Elloree, SC 29047 | $31,944 |
76 | George T Perrow | Cameron, SC 29030 | $31,522 |
77 | John C Zimmerman Jr | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $31,276 |
78 | Charles E Bozard | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $30,790 |
79 | George William Haigler | Newport News, VA 23602 | $26,883 |
80 | T And T LLC | Vance, SC 29163 | $25,188 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”