Farm Subsidy information

Calhoun County, South Carolina

Total Subsidies in Calhoun County, South Carolina, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,119

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calhoun County, South Carolina totaled $161,675,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
81T R StoweWytheville, VA 24382$264,340
82Elizabeth Prickett OlsonSaint Matthews, SC 29135$262,421
83Low Falls Wholesale NurseryCameron, SC 29030$259,868
84R D Wannamaker JrSaint Matthews, SC 29135$257,731
85Riley FarmsOrangeburg, SC 29115$248,340
86Estate Of John Cecil Moore JrNorth, SC 29112$245,308
87Curtis Michael Moss, Jr. Dba Millwood Place FarmsCameron, SC 29030$233,807
88Belleville Farms LLCSt Matthews, SC 29135$231,731
89Richard CarsonCameron, SC 29030$219,781
90Strock Farms PartnershipElloree, SC 29047$215,546
91Hi Cotton FarmHilton Head Island, SC 29928$211,034
92George T PerrowCameron, SC 29030$208,854
93Hi Cotton Greenhouses LLCSaint Matthews, SC 29135$208,288
94Jeffrey W. MooreNorth, SC 29112$196,866
95Wannamaker Sc Properties LLCTampa, FL 33609$195,897
96Chris SikesSaint Matthews, SC 29135$190,898
97Roger L HillGaston, SC 29053$185,134
98Henry W StallworthSt Matthews, SC 29135$181,818
99W Keitt Wannamaker JrBaton Rouge, LA 70808$181,805
100James D Rast IIICameron, SC 29030$176,870

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag