Conservation Reserve Program in Calhoun County, South Carolina, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 491

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Calhoun County, South Carolina totaled $5,975,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
121A Charles Suggs SrSaint Matthews, SC 29135$12,132
122Annie S TaylorSaint Matthews, SC 29135$11,962
123Houser - Banks HeirsSumter, SC 29150$11,961
124George A RickenbakerSaint Matthews, SC 29135$11,956
125Kenneth SmithSaint Matthews, SC 29135$11,812
126Annie W HoffmanSaint Matthews, SC 29135$11,604
127Gloria S CarsonWilliston, SC 29853$11,518
128Dorothy S CarnSaint Matthews, SC 29135$11,518
129Julian D Wiles JrMount Pleasant, SC 29464$11,133
130Vernelle Z HoffmanSaint Matthews, SC 29135$11,039
131Dorothy R CriderSaint Matthews, SC 29135$11,033
132Estate Of Julian F CarsonElloree, SC 29047$10,989
133Herbert M GeigerSwansea, SC 29160$10,977
134Frances C KellerSummerton, SC 29148$10,828
135Thomas H Symmes JrOrangeburg, SC 29116$10,722
136Frank L GunterLexington, SC 29072$10,692
137Kathryn A StablerSaint Matthews, SC 29135$10,672
138Barbara A JohnsonFlorence, SC 29505$10,672
139Talley CulclasureSaint Matthews, SC 29135$10,548
140Daniel SturkieNorth, SC 29112$10,474

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag