Farm Subsidy information

Calhoun County, South Carolina

Total Subsidies in Calhoun County, South Carolina, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,119

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calhoun County, South Carolina totaled $161,675,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
1Haigler Farms PartnershipCameron, SC 29030$9,754,307
2Perrow FarmsCameron, SC 29030$5,938,700
3W M Smith & SonsSaint Matthews, SC 29135$5,722,806
4Lyons Brothers FarmsElloree, SC 29047$5,094,025
5Palmetto FarmsFort Motte, SC 29135$4,746,189
6Bates Houck FarmCameron, SC 29030$3,470,011
7Kendall WannamakerSaint Matthews, SC 29135$3,081,071
8Harry L Ott JrSaint Matthews, SC 29135$2,983,904
9Mary Lil WannamakerSaint Matthews, SC 29135$2,849,360
10William C Holman JrCameron, SC 29030$2,663,198
11W H BullCameron, SC 29030$2,176,295
12Kym Farm IncElloree, SC 29047$1,998,709
13Oak Lane FarmSaint Matthews, SC 29135$1,962,855
14Delbert C InabinetOrangeburg, SC 29118$1,945,164
15Bickley Farms IncElloree, SC 29047$1,856,429
16Hayne Haigler & SonsCameron, SC 29030$1,738,394
17Ag South Farm Credit Aca **Douglas, GA 31534$1,638,781
18John Olson IIISaint Matthews, SC 29135$1,557,418
19Rawl Dargan Culclasure IIISaint Matthews, SC 29135$1,514,814
20Knowlton R StablerSaint Matthews, SC 29135$1,463,384

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag