Farm Subsidy information
Calhoun County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Calhoun County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 220
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calhoun County, South Carolina totaled $6,992,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Curtis Michael Moss, Jr. Dba Millwood Place Farms | Cameron, SC 29030 | $66,051 |
22 | Mary Jo H Spiers | Cameron, SC 29030 | $61,975 |
23 | Jeffrey Legree Kaigler | Swansea, SC 29160 | $61,954 |
24 | Sharpes Farm LLC | North, SC 29112 | $61,163 |
25 | W H Bull | Cameron, SC 29030 | $60,526 |
26 | William H Bull Jr | Cameron, SC 29030 | $60,526 |
27 | Carson Farms | Elloree, SC 29047 | $58,373 |
28 | Jessie Clark Rast Sr | Camden, SC 29020 | $57,611 |
29 | K & R Farm LLC | St Matthews, SC 29135 | $57,490 |
30 | Mark Ott | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $54,016 |
31 | Kym Farm Inc | Elloree, SC 29047 | $52,541 |
32 | William C Holman Jr | Cameron, SC 29030 | $44,746 |
33 | John H Inabinet Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29118 | $41,051 |
34 | J & G Farms Sc LLC | St Matthews, SC 29135 | $40,456 |
35 | John Steven Wiles | Elloree, SC 29047 | $34,842 |
36 | William M Shirer Jr | Cameron, SC 29030 | $33,712 |
37 | Donnie B Porth Farm | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $31,811 |
38 | Curtis Russell Dukes | St Matthews, SC 29135 | $31,701 |
39 | Strock Farms Partnership | Elloree, SC 29047 | $31,224 |
40 | Edward M Rast Jr | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $30,590 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”