Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Calhoun County, South Carolina, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 85
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Calhoun County, South Carolina totaled $4,734,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | W H Bull | Cameron, SC 29030 | $83,229 |
22 | William H Bull Jr | Cameron, SC 29030 | $83,229 |
23 | Mark Ott | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $79,630 |
24 | Raymond Stabler | North, SC 29112 | $65,360 |
25 | Bickley Partnership | Elloree, SC 29047 | $63,534 |
26 | Rawl Dargan Culclasure III | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $62,136 |
27 | Jason G Waltz | St Matthews, SC 29135 | $61,284 |
28 | Ag South Farm Credit Aca ** | Douglas, GA 31534 | $60,120 |
29 | Michelle B Waltz | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $58,880 |
30 | Bickley Farms Inc | Elloree, SC 29047 | $57,423 |
31 | John Steven Wiles | Elloree, SC 29047 | $53,407 |
32 | Curtis Russell Dukes | St Matthews, SC 29135 | $52,316 |
33 | Mary Jo H Spiers | Cameron, SC 29030 | $49,807 |
34 | Jessie Clark Rast Sr | Camden, SC 29020 | $49,711 |
35 | Kyle Monroe Carson | Cameron, SC 29030 | $48,112 |
36 | Kym Farm Inc | Elloree, SC 29047 | $47,880 |
37 | Lee Blackman Jr | Elloree, SC 29047 | $37,436 |
38 | Belleville Farms LLC | St Matthews, SC 29135 | $36,931 |
39 | Curtis Michael Moss, Jr. Dba Millwood Place Farms | Cameron, SC 29030 | $32,804 |
40 | Donnie B Porth Farm | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $29,165 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”