Total Commodity Programs in Calhoun County, South Carolina, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 873

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Calhoun County, South Carolina totaled $112,077,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
1Haigler Farms PartnershipCameron, SC 29030$9,704,608
2Perrow FarmsCameron, SC 29030$5,767,874
3W M Smith & SonsSaint Matthews, SC 29135$5,506,157
4Lyons Brothers FarmsElloree, SC 29047$4,748,778
5Palmetto FarmsFort Motte, SC 29135$4,734,049
6Bates Houck FarmCameron, SC 29030$3,331,246
7Kendall WannamakerSaint Matthews, SC 29135$2,778,019
8Mary Lil WannamakerSaint Matthews, SC 29135$2,649,232
9Harry L Ott JrSaint Matthews, SC 29135$2,646,840
10William C Holman JrCameron, SC 29030$2,540,854
11W H BullCameron, SC 29030$2,072,241
12Kym Farm IncElloree, SC 29047$1,933,016
13Delbert C InabinetOrangeburg, SC 29118$1,912,190
14Oak Lane FarmSaint Matthews, SC 29135$1,811,505
15Bickley Farms IncElloree, SC 29047$1,784,135
16Hayne Haigler & SonsCameron, SC 29030$1,658,264
17Ag South Farm Credit Aca **Douglas, GA 31534$1,566,952
18John Olson IIISaint Matthews, SC 29135$1,419,908
19Rawl Dargan Culclasure IIISaint Matthews, SC 29135$1,411,555
20Jesse D Shirer IIILone Star, SC 29030$1,258,535

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag