Total Commodity Programs in Calhoun County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 212
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Calhoun County, South Carolina totaled $4,451,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bickley Farms Inc | Elloree, SC 29047 | $61,223 |
22 | Sharpes Farm LLC | North, SC 29112 | $61,163 |
23 | W H Bull | Cameron, SC 29030 | $60,526 |
24 | William H Bull Jr | Cameron, SC 29030 | $60,526 |
25 | Jessie Clark Rast Sr | Camden, SC 29020 | $57,611 |
26 | K & R Farm LLC | St Matthews, SC 29135 | $57,490 |
27 | Carson Farms | Elloree, SC 29047 | $56,623 |
28 | Mark Ott | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $54,016 |
29 | Kym Farm Inc | Elloree, SC 29047 | $49,527 |
30 | Jeffrey Legree Kaigler | Swansea, SC 29160 | $43,946 |
31 | John H Inabinet Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29118 | $41,051 |
32 | John Steven Wiles | Elloree, SC 29047 | $34,842 |
33 | William M Shirer Jr | Cameron, SC 29030 | $33,712 |
34 | J & G Farms Sc LLC | St Matthews, SC 29135 | $31,076 |
35 | Donnie B Porth Farm | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $29,689 |
36 | Edward M Rast Jr | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $29,050 |
37 | Kathryn Nixon Rast | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $29,050 |
38 | Longstreet Farms Inc | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $25,936 |
39 | James Howard Shirer Jr | Orangeburg, SC 29118 | $25,729 |
40 | Prickett Farms, LLC | Columbia, SC 29206 | $23,900 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”