Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Charleston County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 51
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Charleston County, South Carolina totaled $226,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Benjamin Jenkins Jr. | Adams Run, SC 29426 | $3,282 |
22 | Vernon Smith | Johns Island, SC 29455 | $3,260 |
23 | Mack Fleming | Wadmalaw Island, SC 29487 | $2,979 |
24 | William Lee Hart Jr | San Francisco, CA 94116 | $2,331 |
25 | Thomas C Garvin Jr | Adams Run, SC 29426 | $2,324 |
26 | Clarence R Boyer Jr | Johns Island, SC 29455 | $2,310 |
27 | E H Walpole Jr | Johns Island, SC 29455 | $2,246 |
28 | James A Cox | Yonges Island, SC 29449 | $2,182 |
29 | Frank E Middleton Jr | Wadmalaw Island, SC 29487 | $1,992 |
30 | Joseph Fields | Johns Island, SC 29455 | $1,944 |
31 | George Days | Edisto Island, SC 29438 | $1,836 |
32 | J Sidi Limehouse III | Johns Island, SC 29455 | $1,814 |
33 | Gyrdel Jerome Green | Yonges Island, SC 29449 | $1,644 |
34 | E H Walpole Jr | Johns Island, SC 29455 | $1,524 |
35 | John Frampton | Edisto Island, SC 29438 | $1,486 |
36 | Jac Inc | Yonges Island, SC 29449 | $1,316 |
37 | Louis Richard Tumbleston | Hollywood, SC 29449 | $1,240 |
38 | John Simmons | Johns Island, SC 29457 | $1,204 |
39 | Daniel F Kennerty | Wadmalaw Island, SC 29487 | $1,149 |
40 | Rudy Payne | Yonges Island, SC 29449 | $1,080 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”