Total Commodity Programs in Charleston County, South Carolina, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 139

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Charleston County, South Carolina totaled $1,725,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
1Green Meadow Nursery LLCHollywood, SC 29449$250,000
2Lowcountry Produce Of CharlestonCharleston, SC 29412$198,301
3Viviane M LefebvreEdisto Island, SC 29438$48,069
4Joseph FieldsJohns Island, SC 29455$46,721
5Gonzales' Land & Timber LLCColumbia, SC 29201$41,661
6Jeffrey M SpahrMc Clellanville, SC 29458$39,868
7John R WhittemoreEdisto Island, SC 29438$36,934
8John B WalpoleWadmalaw Island, SC 29487$36,866
9Osgood D Hamlin JrMt Pleasant, SC 29466$34,303
10Bulls Bay EnterprisesMc Clellanville, SC 29458$28,343
11Barrier Island Oyster Company LLCCharleston, SC 29412$24,658
12W E Walpole Farms LLCWadmalaw Island, SC 29487$22,988
13Sunnyside Farms IncJohns Island, SC 29455$19,790
14Jason SchleizerHanahan, SC 29410$19,665
15Donald BrownMt Pleasant, SC 29464$19,519
16Phuoc TangNorth Charleston, SC 29406$17,973
17C A Magwood Jr Enterprises IncMt Pleasant, SC 29464$17,522
18Keith M SwindellMc Clellanville, SC 29458$16,809
19Sylvan Racine JrMc Clellanville, SC 29458$16,649
20Legare Farms IncJohns Island, SC 29455$16,475

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag