Farm Subsidy information
Chesterfield County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Chesterfield County, South Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,664
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chesterfield County, South Carolina totaled $50,529,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Quail Ridge Farms | Mc Bee, SC 29101 | $206,664 |
22 | Barbara W Byrd | Patrick, SC 29584 | $206,497 |
23 | Richard M Ammons | Marshville, NC 28103 | $204,757 |
24 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $199,722 |
25 | Parker & Sons Farms | Monroe, NC 28112 | $186,337 |
26 | Baker Bros. Farm, Inc. | Monroe, NC 28112 | $185,903 |
27 | Sox Farms Inc | Mc Bee, SC 29101 | $185,542 |
28 | Lois A Poole | Chesterfield, SC 29709 | $182,149 |
29 | Mitch Graham | Mullins, SC 29574 | $173,132 |
30 | E A Freeman Family Lp | Chesterfield, SC 29709 | $166,447 |
31 | Walker B Carpenter | Marshville, NC 28103 | $165,625 |
32 | Joel L Mills | Chesterfield, SC 29709 | $160,414 |
33 | Eric G Plyler Inc | Pageland, SC 29728 | $158,924 |
34 | Emsley A Freeman | Chesterfield, SC 29709 | $155,982 |
35 | Terry L Teal | Patrick, SC 29584 | $154,870 |
36 | Francis Stanley Byrd | Society Hill, SC 29593 | $153,631 |
37 | Randy H Mills | Ruby, SC 29741 | $145,175 |
38 | Ann Miller Outen | Chesterfield, SC 29709 | $144,511 |
39 | Bobby M Norris Jr | Society Hill, SC 29593 | $142,993 |
40 | Henry P Tucker | Society Hill, SC 29593 | $140,080 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”