Farm Subsidy information
Clarendon County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Clarendon County, South Carolina, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 163
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clarendon County, South Carolina totaled $9,328,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Flowers Farms LLC | Summerton, SC 29148 | $355,765 |
2 | John C Mcnair Jr | Manning, SC 29102 | $308,802 |
3 | B & D Farms LLC | Manning, SC 29102 | $242,704 |
4 | Cannon Ag Products LLC | Turbeville, SC 29162 | $192,466 |
5 | Oak III Farms | Summerton, SC 29148 | $183,429 |
6 | Jerry Lee Mcelveen Jr | New Zion, SC 29111 | $157,893 |
7 | Lester C Thompson III | Manning, SC 29102 | $135,212 |
8 | Palmetto State Rice Co LLC | Bonneau, SC 29431 | $105,469 |
9 | Thomas Elam Lee | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $99,445 |
10 | James Houston Hicks | New Zion, SC 29111 | $86,369 |
11 | Jason Mcfaddin Gamble | New Zion, SC 29111 | $73,841 |
12 | William D Welch | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $73,589 |
13 | Stevenson Carl Gamble Jr | New Zion, SC 29111 | $73,161 |
14 | W R Simpson Jr | Manning, SC 29102 | $72,316 |
15 | Two Tel Farms LLC | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $71,613 |
16 | Dubose Landscape Designs | Manning, SC 29102 | $71,373 |
17 | Justin Bailey Mcarthur | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $64,603 |
18 | Jnl Farms LLC | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $60,351 |
19 | J C Witherspoon Jr Inc | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $52,875 |
20 | Gamble Family Farms | New Zion, SC 29111 | $49,237 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>