Farm Subsidy information
Clarendon County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Clarendon County, South Carolina, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 163
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clarendon County, South Carolina totaled $9,328,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | John H Horton III | Manning, SC 29102 | $47,343 |
22 | Moore Family Farms LLC | Manning, SC 29102 | $44,672 |
23 | W L Coker | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $40,696 |
24 | Timothy S Hilliard Jr | Manning, SC 29102 | $39,948 |
25 | Charlton Watts Jr | Turbeville, SC 29162 | $37,377 |
26 | Double F Farms LLC | New Zion, SC 29111 | $36,101 |
27 | Witherspoon Farms LLC | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $34,666 |
28 | William Davis Welch Jr | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $33,910 |
29 | Hugh R Thompson Jr | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $32,996 |
30 | Mls Farm LLC | Manning, SC 29102 | $31,771 |
31 | Bryce Albert Myers | Meade, KS 67864 | $29,054 |
32 | Rbt Farms LLC | Lake City, SC 29560 | $25,607 |
33 | Oneil Ward | Manning, SC 29102 | $24,968 |
34 | T2 LLC | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $23,963 |
35 | Timothy S Mcelveen | New Zion, SC 29111 | $22,873 |
36 | , | $22,834 | |
37 | William Hugh Epps | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $22,275 |
38 | Duckford Plantation Inc | Pinewood, SC 29125 | $20,882 |
39 | William R Simpson Sr | Manning, SC 29102 | $16,543 |
40 | Patricia S Epps | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $15,973 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”