Crop Disaster Assistance Program in Clarendon County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 256
Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in Clarendon County, South Carolina totaled $8,919,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Crop Disaster Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Tindal Farms | Pinewood, SC 29125 | $35,880 |
62 | Van Alfred Johnson | Lynchburg, SC 29080 | $35,440 |
63 | County Line Farms Inc | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $35,399 |
64 | Burnt Branch Farm | Turbeville, SC 29162 | $35,014 |
65 | Carlysle Chandler | Cades, SC 29518 | $33,154 |
66 | Beard Farms Inc | Lake City, SC 29560 | $33,088 |
67 | Ben Scurry Jr | Manning, SC 29102 | $32,695 |
68 | Alonzo Reid Mcdonald | Summerton, SC 29148 | $32,536 |
69 | E Lynn Driggers | Turbeville, SC 29162 | $30,726 |
70 | David L Tindal III | Pinewood, SC 29125 | $27,989 |
71 | Mellette Farms | Turbeville, SC 29162 | $27,860 |
72 | Matthew Dubose | Pinewood, SC 29125 | $27,841 |
73 | Hugh R Thompson Jr | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $26,901 |
74 | Charles E Mcdonald | Manning, SC 29102 | $26,837 |
75 | Horton Davis Jr | Manning, SC 29102 | $26,665 |
76 | Charlton Watts Jr | Turbeville, SC 29162 | $26,340 |
77 | Edward C Mckenzie | Lake City, SC 29560 | $24,982 |
78 | Thomas L Floyd | New Zion, SC 29111 | $24,873 |
79 | George M Hicks | New Zion, SC 29111 | $24,373 |
80 | Michael E Lane | Greeleyville, SC 29056 | $24,284 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”