Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Clarendon County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 112
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Clarendon County, South Carolina totaled $1,585,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Kent Coker | Lake City, SC 29560 | $1,116 |
82 | Christopher Joseph Oswald | Summerton, SC 29148 | $1,092 |
83 | Robert Ben Fleming III | Manning, SC 29102 | $1,080 |
84 | Alvin Gibson | Manning, SC 29102 | $1,078 |
85 | Durant Farms | Gable, SC 29051 | $958 |
86 | Shane Blakely Bryant | Manning, SC 29102 | $901 |
87 | Fred Landon Coker | Lake City, SC 29560 | $835 |
88 | Thomas Mouzon Dba Mouzon & Sons Farms | Greeleyville, SC 29056 | $810 |
89 | R Dale Mckenzie | Lake City, SC 29560 | $795 |
90 | W R Ridgeway | Spartanburg, SC 29301 | $774 |
91 | Harry Washington Spann Jr | Pinewood, SC 29125 | $735 |
92 | Lyndsey Jewell Mcdowell | Manning, SC 29102 | $634 |
93 | Larue E Coker | Olanta, SC 29114 | $618 |
94 | Ray Ward | Manning, SC 29102 | $571 |
95 | Derrick Clifton Fort | New Zion, SC 29111 | $568 |
96 | Wendell B Jones | Manning, SC 29102 | $542 |
97 | Jerry E Coker | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $500 |
98 | Willadean B Duke | Manning, SC 29102 | $491 |
99 | Horton Davis Jr | Manning, SC 29102 | $464 |
100 | Billy Ray Ward | Manning, SC 29102 | $457 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”