Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Clarendon County, South Carolina, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 161

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Clarendon County, South Carolina totaled $4,229,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1Oak III FarmsSummerton, SC 29148$419,745
2Flowers Farms LLCSummerton, SC 29148$311,320
3Arbor One Aca **Florence, SC 29502$284,946
4Everett FarmsPinewood, SC 29125$146,787
5S H Jackson Farms LLCManning, SC 29102$143,379
6Duckford Plantation IncPinewood, SC 29125$129,842
7Cannon Ag Products LLCTurbeville, SC 29162$120,577
8Double D FarmsGable, SC 29051$117,269
9John H Horton IIIManning, SC 29102$107,876
10Lester C Thompson IIIManning, SC 29102$104,100
11Thomas Elam LeeAlcolu, SC 29001$101,518
12Jerry Lee Mcelveen JrNew Zion, SC 29111$100,157
13David L Tindal Farms LLCPinewood, SC 29125$92,693
14Cecil Bozard Eaddy JrManning, SC 29102$89,655
15Witherspoon Farms LLCAlcolu, SC 29001$79,185
16Stevenson Carl Gamble JrNew Zion, SC 29111$74,589
17Gamble Family FarmsNew Zion, SC 29111$73,469
18B & D Farms LLCManning, SC 29102$70,754
19Charlton Watts JrTurbeville, SC 29162$68,228
20James Paul EaddyManning, SC 29102$56,870

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag