Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Clarendon County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 38
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Clarendon County, South Carolina totaled $81,636 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cecil B Eaddy | Manning, SC 29102 | $7,678 |
2 | Ethan A Lewis | Pinewood, SC 29125 | $6,933 |
3 | Harold Mcclain | Santee, SC 29142 | $6,236 |
4 | Hezekiah Gibson | Manning, SC 29102 | $5,871 |
5 | Phillip Anthony Robinson | Turbeville, SC 29162 | $4,935 |
6 | George A Mcmanus | Hanahan, SC 29406 | $3,983 |
7 | Cecil Bozard Eaddy Jr | Manning, SC 29102 | $3,798 |
8 | Raynee M Warren | Manning, SC 29102 | $3,641 |
9 | Robert B Fleming Sr | Manning, SC 29102 | $3,019 |
10 | William Hugh Epps | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $2,727 |
11 | Gordon W Mcelveen | New Zion, SC 29111 | $2,717 |
12 | Jeremy B Cannon | Turbeville, SC 29162 | $2,594 |
13 | Cannon Ag Products LLC | Turbeville, SC 29162 | $2,383 |
14 | William Bruce Mcnair | Gable, SC 29051 | $2,316 |
15 | Oneil Ward | Manning, SC 29102 | $1,811 |
16 | Billy Ray Ward | Manning, SC 29102 | $1,647 |
17 | John K Wells | Summerton, SC 29148 | $1,616 |
18 | Henry S Brunson | Manning, SC 29102 | $1,552 |
19 | Wells Farms LLC | Manning, SC 29102 | $1,547 |
20 | Charlton Watts Jr | Turbeville, SC 29162 | $1,537 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>