Farm Subsidy information
Clarendon County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Clarendon County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 284
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clarendon County, South Carolina totaled $9,274,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $429,053 |
2 | Oak III Farms | Summerton, SC 29148 | $361,368 |
3 | John C Mcnair Jr | Manning, SC 29102 | $340,079 |
4 | Titan Fruit & Vegetable Co Inc | Ridge Spring, SC 29129 | $250,000 |
5 | Thomas Elam Lee | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $201,188 |
6 | Two Tel Farms LLC | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $188,299 |
7 | Double D Farms | Gable, SC 29051 | $161,933 |
8 | Flowers Farms LLC | Summerton, SC 29148 | $142,522 |
9 | John H Horton III | Manning, SC 29102 | $130,815 |
10 | Lester C Thompson III | Manning, SC 29102 | $109,607 |
11 | S H Jackson Farms LLC | Manning, SC 29102 | $95,927 |
12 | Jerry Lee Mcelveen Jr | New Zion, SC 29111 | $89,989 |
13 | Gamble Family Farms | New Zion, SC 29111 | $84,283 |
14 | Cecil Bozard Eaddy Jr | Manning, SC 29102 | $75,761 |
15 | Jnl Farms LLC | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $72,033 |
16 | B & D Farms LLC | Manning, SC 29102 | $70,754 |
17 | David L Tindal Farms LLC | Pinewood, SC 29125 | $67,821 |
18 | Witherspoon Farms LLC | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $67,515 |
19 | Duckford Plantation Inc | Pinewood, SC 29125 | $66,691 |
20 | Palmetto State Rice Co LLC | Bonneau, SC 29431 | $59,347 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>