Total Commodity Programs in Clarendon County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 199
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Clarendon County, South Carolina totaled $2,477,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | William D Welch | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $32,713 |
22 | Moore Family Farms LLC | Manning, SC 29102 | $30,030 |
23 | Durant Farms | Gable, SC 29051 | $27,979 |
24 | Stevenson Carl Gamble Jr | New Zion, SC 29111 | $27,304 |
25 | James Paul Eaddy | Manning, SC 29102 | $27,244 |
26 | David L Tindal Iv | Pinewood, SC 29125 | $27,016 |
27 | Mls Farm LLC | Manning, SC 29102 | $26,770 |
28 | Triple S Farms Of Sc, LLC | Manning, SC 29102 | $26,600 |
29 | William R Simpson Sr | Manning, SC 29102 | $24,760 |
30 | Cannon Ag Products LLC | Turbeville, SC 29162 | $22,945 |
31 | Lewis Brothers Farm | Paxville, SC 29102 | $22,589 |
32 | Scott H Jackson Jr | Manning, SC 29102 | $21,930 |
33 | R M Elliott Farms LLC | Manning, SC 29102 | $21,233 |
34 | Dubose Landscape Designs | Manning, SC 29102 | $20,843 |
35 | T S Lee & Sons Inc | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $19,712 |
36 | James Houston Hicks | New Zion, SC 29111 | $19,259 |
37 | Synovus Bank ** | Statesboro, GA 30459 | $19,013 |
38 | Two Tel Farms LLC | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $18,359 |
39 | T2 LLC | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $18,028 |
40 | Charlton Watts Jr | Turbeville, SC 29162 | $17,639 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”