Farm Subsidy information
Darlington County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Darlington County, South Carolina, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 124
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Darlington County, South Carolina totaled $11,177,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Richard A Galloway | Darlington, SC 29532 | $77,127 |
22 | William N Chapman Farms LLC | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $72,203 |
23 | Oneal Farms | Society Hill, SC 29593 | $70,276 |
24 | M E White Farms LLC | Timmonsville, SC 29161 | $68,763 |
25 | W W Kirven III | Darlington, SC 29540 | $63,781 |
26 | Robert T Windham | Lamar, SC 29069 | $60,969 |
27 | Golden Hill Farms LLC | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $57,610 |
28 | Wes Woodard | Darlington, SC 29532 | $56,060 |
29 | Roachel D King Iv | Society Hill, SC 29593 | $48,300 |
30 | Johnson Brothers Farm Of Hartsville, Sc LLC | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $46,262 |
31 | Frankie Woodard | Darlington, SC 29532 | $44,196 |
32 | James Edward Hough | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $40,192 |
33 | C Kelly Windham | Lamar, SC 29069 | $37,937 |
34 | Glen E Weatherford | Darlington, SC 29532 | $36,563 |
35 | Roblyn's Neck Trophy Club LLC | Darlington, SC 29540 | $34,622 |
36 | , | $31,151 | |
37 | Lonzo Mcclain | Lamar, SC 29069 | $30,520 |
38 | Daniel T Miller | Timmonsville, SC 29161 | $28,899 |
39 | Dickerson Farm Inc | Darlington, SC 29540 | $27,901 |
40 | Tyler Alexander Dowling | Timmonsville, SC 29161 | $27,375 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”