Production Flexibility Program in Darlington County, South Carolina, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 501

Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Darlington County, South Carolina totaled $12,637,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Production Flexibility Program
1995-2023
41Quiet Brook Farms IncDarlington, SC 29540$109,248
42E L James JrDarlington, SC 29540$106,322
43Glen E WeatherfordDarlington, SC 29532$103,726
44Melvin EnglishLamar, SC 29069$102,774
45Raymond Lavan AmersonLamar, SC 29069$100,912
46A W Woodham IIBishopville, SC 29010$99,223
47Toye B Stewart JrDarlington, SC 29532$96,462
48Lide H JohnsonHartsville, SC 29550$93,760
49Kelley PartnershipHartsville, SC 29550$91,644
50Benton FarmsDarlington, SC 29540$89,999
51R D King IIISociety Hill, SC 29593$87,030
52Marlowe FarmsDarlington, SC 29532$84,109
53Milton H Anderson IIITimmonsville, SC 29161$82,842
54James B JohnsonHartsville, SC 29550$80,489
55Pete BeasleyBishopville, SC 29010$80,226
56Bill MunnDarlington, SC 29532$78,917
57William Norris ChapmanHartsville, SC 29550$78,176
58Mitchell E TynerDarlington, SC 29532$76,888
59Clemson University C/o Garland VeBlackville, SC 29817$75,762
60Frank M FlowersDarlington, SC 29540$74,014

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag