Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Darlington County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 126
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Darlington County, South Carolina totaled $1,685,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Roachel D King Iv | Society Hill, SC 29593 | $8,550 |
42 | Mike Smith | Darlington, SC 29540 | $8,158 |
43 | Thomas G Chaplin III | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $7,824 |
44 | Golden Hill Farms LLC | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $7,753 |
45 | Windham Family Farms Partnership | Lamar, SC 29069 | $7,697 |
46 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $7,564 |
47 | Clemson University C/o Garland Veasey | Clemson, SC 29634 | $7,537 |
48 | Norris Farms | Society Hill, SC 29593 | $7,130 |
49 | Anthony C Privette | Lamar, SC 29069 | $6,802 |
50 | Dorla Lewis | Darlington, SC 29540 | $6,477 |
51 | Agriservices Inc Of The Pee Dee | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $6,414 |
52 | Brent F Gandy | Darlington, SC 29540 | $6,110 |
53 | Baucom Family Farm General Partnership | Monroe, NC 28110 | $6,005 |
54 | R Hoyt Campbell | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $5,997 |
55 | Benton Farms | Darlington, SC 29540 | $5,554 |
56 | John W Rogers | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $5,200 |
57 | David L Chaplin | Darlington, SC 29540 | $4,984 |
58 | David Farmer | Florence, SC 29501 | $4,879 |
59 | Marshall W Flowers | Darlington, SC 29540 | $4,554 |
60 | Sugar Hill Acres LLC | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $4,533 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”