Farm Subsidy information

Darlington County, South Carolina

Total Subsidies in Darlington County, South Carolina, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,545

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Darlington County, South Carolina totaled $203,290,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
1Rogers Brothers FarmHartsville, SC 29550$8,209,680
2Doyle W OnealDarlington, SC 29540$3,471,837
3Robert T WindhamLamar, SC 29069$3,409,868
4Arbor One Aca **Florence, SC 29502$3,276,928
5Galloway FarmsDarlington, SC 29532$3,142,770
6J L Norwood JrDarlington, SC 29532$3,090,386
7Woodard Farms IncDarlington, SC 29540$2,937,882
8Oneal FarmsSociety Hill, SC 29593$2,819,534
9Lawson FarmsDarlington, SC 29540$2,800,689
10Thomas G ChaplinHartsville, SC 29550$2,798,880
11Richard A GallowayDarlington, SC 29532$2,727,810
12C Kelly WindhamLamar, SC 29069$2,587,267
13Dorla LewisDarlington, SC 29540$2,312,610
14J Robert Griggs Sr.Hartsville, SC 29550$2,119,954
15Cecil T JamesDarlington, SC 29540$1,892,417
16W W Kirven IIIDarlington, SC 29540$1,880,008
17Franklin R GleasonDarlington, SC 29540$1,861,890
18Les GallowayDarlington, SC 29532$1,757,111
19Dargan Farms PartnershipDarlington, SC 29540$1,717,217
20James N Chapman Farms LLCHartsville, SC 29550$1,667,687

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag