Farm Subsidy information
Dillon County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Dillon County, South Carolina, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 106
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dillon County, South Carolina totaled $5,839,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | John M Gasque | Dillon, SC 29536 | $18,645 |
22 | Fitzhugh L Bethea | Dillon, SC 29536 | $15,332 |
23 | Dusty Williams | Florence, SC 29501 | $14,967 |
24 | Danny O Price | Dillon, SC 29536 | $14,322 |
25 | Floyd Johnson Jr | Latta, SC 29565 | $14,171 |
26 | , | $13,011 | |
27 | , | $12,610 | |
28 | Al Williams Enterprise Inc | Latta, SC 29565 | $11,771 |
29 | Matthew J Mccoll | Dillon, SC 29536 | $11,758 |
30 | Neal C Byrd Jr | Latta, SC 29565 | $11,630 |
31 | Charles Smith Miller | Nichols, SC 29581 | $10,748 |
32 | Rowell Farms LLC | Hamer, SC 29547 | $8,740 |
33 | Wma Farms Inc | Lake View, SC 29563 | $8,619 |
34 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $7,502 |
35 | Ace Farms Inc | Lake View, SC 29563 | $7,496 |
36 | , | $7,021 | |
37 | Danise N Stephens & Janna L Nance | Lake View, SC 29563 | $5,994 |
38 | David Cox Farms Inc | Lake View, SC 29563 | $5,781 |
39 | Joe Hayes Farms LLC | Latta, SC 29565 | $5,634 |
40 | Jacqueline Muhammad Dba Muhammad Farms | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $5,355 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”