Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Dillon County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 43
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Dillon County, South Carolina totaled $517,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert Carl Huggins | Nichols, SC 29581 | $12,959 |
22 | Richard C Deschner | Little Rock, SC 29567 | $10,500 |
23 | Kenneth Wayne Long | Latta, SC 29565 | $9,012 |
24 | James Earl Calhoun | Fork, SC 29543 | $8,975 |
25 | Daniel Joyner Nance | Lake View, SC 29563 | $8,260 |
26 | William Driggers | Hamer, SC 29547 | $7,749 |
27 | Jerry W Page | Lake View, SC 29563 | $5,511 |
28 | Susan L Miller | Lake View, SC 29563 | $4,538 |
29 | Neal Byrd Dba Partner Farms | Mullins, SC 29574 | $4,138 |
30 | Baxley & Baxley Farms | Dillon, SC 29536 | $3,139 |
31 | C & M Hog Farm LLC | Latta, SC 29565 | $3,138 |
32 | Betty Allen Farms | Latta, SC 29565 | $2,254 |
33 | Neil Rouse | Fork, SC 29543 | $2,196 |
34 | Paul King | Nichols, SC 29581 | $1,875 |
35 | Neal Rogers | Fork, SC 29543 | $1,682 |
36 | Elford Hewey Ford | Nichols, SC 29581 | $1,500 |
37 | Joseph M Gleason | Fork, SC 29543 | $1,260 |
38 | Christine S Mckenzie | Lake View, SC 29563 | $1,037 |
39 | Robert R Garris | Lake View, SC 29563 | $994 |
40 | Watson D Bethea | Hamer, SC 29547 | $969 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”