Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Dillon County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 81
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Dillon County, South Carolina totaled $799,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Gordon R Mclellan Jr | Fork, SC 29543 | $503 |
62 | Keith Carter | Lake View, SC 29563 | $428 |
63 | Crystal S Bailey | Sellers, SC 29592 | $392 |
64 | Fitzhugh L Bethea | Dillon, SC 29536 | $356 |
65 | John D Coleman III | Florence, SC 29501 | $342 |
66 | Ruth M Kirksey Trust | Columbia, SC 29212 | $301 |
67 | F G Smith | Mount Pleasant, SC 29464 | $299 |
68 | Thurman Purnell Jr | Hamer, SC 29547 | $269 |
69 | Thomas Neil Mcrimmon | Little Rock, SC 29567 | $264 |
70 | Charles H Vitou Jr | Burlington, NC 27215 | $199 |
71 | Johnny S Mclean | Micanopy, FL 32667 | $178 |
72 | Dillon Marlboro Properties LLC | Charlotte, NC 28226 | $178 |
73 | Martha A Mcintyre | Dillon, SC 29536 | $160 |
74 | John D Mcinnis Jr | Dillon, SC 29536 | $148 |
75 | Margaret M Martin Trust | Hilton Head, SC 29926 | $148 |
76 | Edwin L Mcinnis III | Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 | $131 |
77 | Catherine N Hoffmann | Kingston, NY 12401 | $103 |
78 | Phillip Davis | Sellers, SC 29592 | $94 |
79 | Milton Thomas Coleman III | Latta, SC 29565 | $59 |
80 | Edwin L Mcinnis III | Amenia, NY 12501 | $33 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”