Farm Subsidy information
Dillon County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Dillon County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,315
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dillon County, South Carolina totaled $149,446,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Wilton Shooter & Sns Fms Inc | Rowland, NC 28383 | $549,323 |
42 | Mendel Smith Jr | Dillon, SC 29536 | $545,605 |
43 | Neal Byrd Dba Partner Farms | Mullins, SC 29574 | $533,586 |
44 | Daniel J Nance Jr | Lake View, SC 29563 | $525,805 |
45 | Robert L Stephens Jr | Dillon, SC 29536 | $473,602 |
46 | Robert Carl Huggins | Nichols, SC 29581 | $457,775 |
47 | J Gregory Huggins | Nichols, SC 29581 | $452,825 |
48 | Paul Long & Sons Part | Latta, SC 29565 | $413,026 |
49 | Louie Bodenhamer | Rowland, NC 28383 | $405,630 |
50 | R & W Farms | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $401,906 |
51 | Charles A Arnette | Dillon, SC 29536 | $393,440 |
52 | Kenny Wayne Bullock | Lake View, SC 29563 | $371,679 |
53 | Pate G Mcrae | Dillon, SC 29536 | $369,491 |
54 | Q & Q Farms Inc | Dillon, SC 29536 | $362,908 |
55 | Nelson Snipes | Dillon, SC 29536 | $353,258 |
56 | William Keith Price | Dillon, SC 29536 | $352,248 |
57 | Thomas R Mcrimmon Jr | Rowland, NC 28383 | $346,528 |
58 | Jeffrey B Blanton | Mullins, SC 29574 | $343,450 |
59 | John M Gasque Jr | Dillon, SC 29536 | $341,051 |
60 | Michael K Reaves | Hamer, SC 29547 | $337,701 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”