Farm Subsidy information

Dorchester County, South Carolina

Total Subsidies in Dorchester County, South Carolina, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 734

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dorchester County, South Carolina totaled $64,245,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
21Gunter FarmsReevesville, SC 29471$837,983
22Four Holes Land & Cattle LLCBowman, SC 29018$786,709
23James N InfingerSaint George, SC 29477$633,224
24Reeves Brothers FarmsElloree, SC 29047$546,331
25Coastline Forest Products IncHarleyville, SC 29448$525,414
26Jeff ReevesElloree, SC 29047$505,656
27Ham Bone Farm LLCReevesville, SC 29471$467,638
28R & R FarmsDorchester, SC 29437$453,231
29Daniel L McalhaneyBranchville, SC 29432$404,969
30Pendarvis Farms LLCHarleyville, SC 29448$356,669
31Richard W McclureSaint George, SC 29477$340,924
32John Herbert PendarvisHarleyville, SC 29448$325,070
33L A Gunter FarmsReevesville, SC 29471$323,052
34Sublett Adolph Mcalhany JrBranchville, SC 29432$312,683
35Furman L DukesReevesville, SC 29471$307,344
36D Braxton Berry EstateReevesville, SC 29471$305,878
37Ryan GunterReevesville, SC 29471$295,665
38James Steve McalhanyBranchville, SC 29432$295,312
39James Roger ClarkDorchester, SC 29437$285,537
40Farm Services Agency **Langdon, ND 58249$273,295

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag