Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Dorchester County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 88
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Dorchester County, South Carolina totaled $278,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | C F Judy | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $1,128 |
42 | William D Hill Jr | Ridgeville, SC 29472 | $1,086 |
43 | Reeves Bros Poultry Farm | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $1,066 |
44 | Langston Carey E Hilton | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $895 |
45 | Anthony T Mcalhany | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $888 |
46 | Richard W Mcclure | Saint George, SC 29477 | $866 |
47 | David K Maxwell | Summerville, SC 29483 | $842 |
48 | Ham Bone Farm LLC | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $802 |
49 | Virginia Walters | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $783 |
50 | Henry Thomas Mcalhany | Spartanburg, SC 29307 | $769 |
51 | H Thad Wimberly | Branchville, SC 29432 | $712 |
52 | Jonathan Berry | Branchville, SC 29432 | $712 |
53 | Thomas W Riley | Summerville, SC 29483 | $636 |
54 | Willie R Davis | Saint George, SC 29477 | $579 |
55 | J Wilson Westbury Jr | Maggie Valley, NC 28751 | $547 |
56 | Thomas Jordan | Saint George, SC 29477 | $513 |
57 | Hugo Ruiz | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $494 |
58 | Michael Durr | Saint George, SC 29477 | $489 |
59 | Anthony Cecil Crook | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $481 |
60 | Mike Crook | Saint George, SC 29477 | $481 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”