Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Dorchester County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 69
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Dorchester County, South Carolina totaled $593,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mike Hilton | Ridgeville, SC 29472 | $1,762 |
42 | Wayne Welch | Ridgeville, SC 29472 | $1,614 |
43 | Ham Bone Farm LLC | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $1,571 |
44 | Robert V Hilton | Ridgeville, SC 29472 | $1,511 |
45 | Matt Hoover | Ridgeville, SC 29472 | $1,497 |
46 | Robert Lee Smith | Bowman, SC 29018 | $1,375 |
47 | Ryan Stanley Bishop | Harleyville, SC 29448 | $1,231 |
48 | Reeves Bros Poultry Farm | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $976 |
49 | Glenn Risher | Harleyville, SC 29448 | $923 |
50 | Joyce W Davis | Saint George, SC 29477 | $883 |
51 | Hughey E Reeves | Saint George, SC 29477 | $734 |
52 | Jared Weathers | Saint George, SC 29477 | $651 |
53 | George A Reeves | Saint George, SC 29477 | $610 |
54 | Danny Jackson | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $603 |
55 | Robert P Deas III | Ridgeville, SC 29472 | $596 |
56 | Travis Berry | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $480 |
57 | Michael Kemmerlin | Ridgeville, SC 29472 | $442 |
58 | Robert D Behr | Harleyville, SC 29448 | $410 |
59 | Thomas Jordan | Saint George, SC 29477 | $407 |
60 | Mark Wimberly Farms LLC | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $352 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”