Counter Cyclical Program in Dorchester County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 243
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Dorchester County, South Carolina totaled $4,200,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Lucas Farm & Kennel LLC | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $5,763 |
62 | W Tolman Salisbury | Summerville, SC 29483 | $5,707 |
63 | George A Reeves | Saint George, SC 29477 | $5,674 |
64 | Charles W Traxler | Charleston, SC 29414 | $4,954 |
65 | James Fortana | Saint George, SC 29477 | $4,873 |
66 | Reeves Farm | Saint George, SC 29477 | $4,588 |
67 | Mitchell A Crook | Saint George, SC 29477 | $4,536 |
68 | Walters Hog Farm | Saint George, SC 29477 | $4,483 |
69 | Anthony Cecil Crook | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $4,454 |
70 | Mike Crook | Saint George, SC 29477 | $4,454 |
71 | Robert O Collins | Barnwell, SC 29812 | $4,403 |
72 | Eddie Joseph Myzell | Ridgeville, SC 29472 | $4,197 |
73 | Reeves Spreader Service | Saint George, SC 29477 | $4,048 |
74 | George Sanders | Ridgeville, SC 29472 | $3,468 |
75 | James W Pendarvis | Dorchester, SC 29437 | $3,406 |
76 | Wayne Welch | Ridgeville, SC 29472 | $3,292 |
77 | Bert Judy | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $3,191 |
78 | Kevin Reeves | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $3,177 |
79 | John L Parker Jr | Harleyville, SC 29448 | $3,148 |
80 | Annie Mae Bowick | Charleston, SC 29414 | $3,135 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”