Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Dorchester County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 116
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Dorchester County, South Carolina totaled $1,953,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Shelley Reeves Wilds | Saint George, SC 29477 | $1,012 |
82 | Horsepen Branch LLC | Ridgeville, SC 29472 | $990 |
83 | Patricia Wilds | Saint George, SC 29477 | $886 |
84 | Robert D Behr | Harleyville, SC 29448 | $880 |
85 | Thomas Jordan | Saint George, SC 29477 | $853 |
86 | Travis Berry | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $840 |
87 | Michael Kemmerlin | Ridgeville, SC 29472 | $816 |
88 | Holcombe M Bell Jr | Harleyville, SC 29448 | $759 |
89 | Mike Crook | Saint George, SC 29477 | $736 |
90 | Steve L Rickenbaker | Summerville, SC 29483 | $715 |
91 | Alexander Goodwine | Ridgeville, SC 29472 | $666 |
92 | Ray Lemon | Harleyville, SC 29448 | $633 |
93 | George E Moore Jr | Saint George, SC 29477 | $605 |
94 | Danny Jackson | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $603 |
95 | Barbara Cox | Summerville, SC 29483 | $568 |
96 | Richard G Gruber | Bowman, SC 29018 | $549 |
97 | Louis Alan Grant | Dorchester, SC 29437 | $507 |
98 | Thomas F Williams | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $495 |
99 | Harvey C Kizer Jr | Saint George, SC 29477 | $495 |
100 | Rocky Gethers | Ridgeville, SC 29472 | $443 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”