Production Flexibility Program in Dorchester County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 304
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Dorchester County, South Carolina totaled $3,050,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | William F All | Dorchester, SC 29437 | $1,059 |
162 | Meredith Hildebrand | Saint George, SC 29477 | $1,031 |
163 | Judy C Bilton | Holly Hill, SC 29059 | $1,029 |
164 | Reby K Pate Estate | Saint George, SC 29477 | $1,025 |
165 | Timothy Metts | Branchville, SC 29432 | $1,000 |
166 | Richard G Gruber | Bowman, SC 29018 | $999 |
167 | Linda H Horne | Saint George, SC 29477 | $978 |
168 | Walter H Moore Jr | Chesterfield, VA 23838 | $972 |
169 | Cynthia A Miller | Ridgeville, SC 29472 | $942 |
170 | Reka W Wimberly | Branchville, SC 29432 | $932 |
171 | Bessie M Johnston | Harleyville, SC 29448 | $930 |
172 | Joseph Bryant | North Charleston, SC 29405 | $915 |
173 | Dan Mizzell Jr | Charleston, SC 29412 | $914 |
174 | Hughey E. Reeves | Saint George, SC 29477 | $880 |
175 | Hazel C Walters | Holly Hill, SC 29059 | $864 |
176 | Joseph F Bryant | Dorchester, SC 29437 | $859 |
177 | Herbert Lee Anderson | Harleyville, SC 29448 | $825 |
178 | Peter R Dexter | Ridgeville, SC 29472 | $816 |
179 | Eddie Fralix | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $808 |
180 | Robert V Hilton | Ridgeville, SC 29472 | $783 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”