Tobacco Loss Assistance Program in Dorchester County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 63
Recipients of Tobacco Loss Assistance Program from farms in Dorchester County, South Carolina totaled $139,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Tobacco Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | John Herbert Pendarvis | Harleyville, SC 29448 | $22,562 |
2 | Infinger Farms | Saint George, SC 29477 | $20,195 |
3 | F L Sweatman Jr | Saint George, SC 29477 | $14,226 |
4 | J R Bell Estate | Saint George, SC 29477 | $12,455 |
5 | Bryion Yeoman | Saint George, SC 29477 | $11,465 |
6 | James N Infinger | Saint George, SC 29477 | $10,616 |
7 | Pendarvis Farms LLC | Harleyville, SC 29448 | $7,622 |
8 | John Trenton Pendarvis | Harleyville, SC 29448 | $6,646 |
9 | Martha W Sweatman | Saint George, SC 29477 | $5,332 |
10 | G Lawton Drew | Mullins, SC 29574 | $4,532 |
11 | Leroy Parker | Harleyville, SC 29448 | $3,731 |
12 | Pen Farms | Harleyville, SC 29448 | $3,277 |
13 | Nolton J Infinger | Saint George, SC 29477 | $2,583 |
14 | Frances T Pendarvis | Harleyville, SC 29448 | $2,237 |
15 | Ervin Capers | Harleyville, SC 29448 | $962 |
16 | A L Mizell C/o Lee Mizell Estate | Saint George, SC 29477 | $894 |
17 | Kent Mizell | Saint George, SC 29477 | $887 |
18 | Anne K Reeves | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $712 |
19 | Charles Kizer | Saint George, SC 29477 | $712 |
20 | William M Kizer | Saint George, SC 29477 | $606 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>