Farm Subsidy information
Edgefield County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Edgefield County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 563
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Edgefield County, South Carolina totaled $106,117,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Berry Plantation Inc | North Augusta, SC 29860 | $88,821 |
42 | Three Star Vineyard And Orchard Of Johnston LLC | Johnston, SC 29832 | $85,924 |
43 | G W Rauton III | Johnston, SC 29832 | $84,099 |
44 | Henry Earl Clark | Ridge Spring, SC 29129 | $83,632 |
45 | Herlong Farms | Johnston, SC 29832 | $82,988 |
46 | Clark Forrest | Johnston, SC 29832 | $81,839 |
47 | Rubie H Yonce | Spartanburg, SC 29306 | $80,900 |
48 | J Matt Forrest | Johnston, SC 29832 | $80,000 |
49 | River Edge Forest's LLC | Edgefield, SC 29824 | $76,554 |
50 | Frank Berry | Johnston, SC 29832 | $74,125 |
51 | Hammond Brothers Farm | Clarks Hill, SC 29821 | $68,312 |
52 | Sabra M Mosley | Greenwood, SC 29649 | $62,979 |
53 | James M Forrest Jr | Ward, SC 29166 | $61,321 |
54 | Edgefield Timber Inc | North Augusta, SC 29860 | $58,452 |
55 | Daniel Price Jr | Trenton, SC 29847 | $53,264 |
56 | Otto W Ray Jr | Ridge Spring, SC 29129 | $52,922 |
57 | Douglas H Herlong | Johnston, SC 29832 | $49,182 |
58 | Edward Agner | Edgefield, SC 29824 | $48,461 |
59 | J C Seawright | Edgefield, SC 29824 | $47,500 |
60 | John A Yonce | Aiken, SC 29801 | $47,242 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”